Court denies stay; State Department must issue accurate passport to nonbinary intersex citizen
DENVER – A U.S. District Court Judge on Thursday denied a U.S. State Department request to stay his September, 2018 order which prohibited the agency from relying upon its binary-only gender marker policy to withhold an accurate passport from Lambda Legal client Dana Zzyym, a U.S. Navy veteran who is intersex and nonbinary, and does not identify as male or female.
The State Department denied Dana’s passport application because Dana could not accurately choose either male or female on the passport application form, and the form does not provide any other gender marker designation. In November 2018, Dana was among the first Coloradans to obtain a driver’s license with a nonbinary “X” gender marker after the State of Colorado changed its policy in response to Dana’s federal lawsuit against the U.S. State Department.
This represents Dana’s third victory in their battle with the State Department to secure an accurate passport. In November, 2016, the same district court found the State Department had violated the federal Administrative Procedure Act and ordered the department to reconsider its binary-only gender policy. The State Department doubled-down on its discriminatory male-or-female-only policy to deny Dana a passport, leading to a second ruling last September. The State Department then sought a stay from the District Court judge on complying with his order while the agency appealed the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
“Today, a federal judge has found that there is no defensible reason to delay the issuance of Dana’s passport until after the appeal,” Lambda Legal Counsel Paul Castillo said. “The court rejected the State Department’s arguments as to security, complexity and cost related to producing an accurate passport for Dana, and instead determined that the harm to Dana of lost travel opportunities outweighed whatever harms the State Department claimed. No law-abiding citizen should be precluded from leaving the country simply because of who they are.”
From the Ruling:
“If the Department concludes that issuing a single passport to Dana even with appropriate notice will undermine the system of international travel as we know it …it can comply with the judgment by updating its software systems. While this may be a difficult choice for the Department, it is not an impossible choice… Dana has missed travel opportunities for four years throughout the course of this litigation, and Dana would continue to miss travel opportunities if a stay is granted.”
“It has been more than four years since Dana first applied for an accurate passport, and still they wait,” Castillo added. “Several countries around the globe issue passports with gender markers other than male or female. Additionally, eight U.S. states and the District of Columbia now permit nonbinary gender options on identity documents, such as drivers’ licenses and birth certificates. And recently, all the major U.S. air carriers announced they would soon follow suit, allowing passengers to select M, F, X and U when purchasing a ticket. If they can do it, why can’t the U.S. State Department?”
Read more about the lawsuit, Zzyym v. Pompeo, here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/co_zzyym-v-pompeo
Press release from Lambda Legal